Thanks Bdale and Keith that gives me much more confidence to go higher!
I also use an Arrow 5-element yagi.
So far on flights to 8k ft I have been getting  RSSI of -75 to
-85dBm...provided i remember to point the yagi!





On 14 August 2012 16:07, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Bdale Garbee <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Geoff Hendrick <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> I saved this comment a while ago but cant remember where i saw it:
> >> "Tests performed at Altus Metrum have shown that a 3-element yagi
> antenna
> >> yields good telemetry from rockets to 20 Km (65,600 feet) altitude, and
> >> that a 11-element yagi antenna can receive telemetry from the
> TeleMetrum to
> >> around 100 Km (62 miles)"
> >
> > These numbers were extrapolated from signal strength measurements on
> > actual flights.  The highest actual flight I'm aware of so far that
> > we've got in our flight database was Adrian Adamson's L single-motor
> > record shot which went to something over 31k feet AGL.  The recorded
> > telemetry file shows good reception through apogee.  I'm not sure what
> > the ground station antenna was, but I'd guess a 5-element Arrow yagi.
>
> Yes, I used a 5-element Arrow yagi to track his flight. I tracked it
> down within 60m of the ground, at about 3.2km north of the flight line;
> at that point, it descended behind the RVs parked at the launch.
>
> One funny thing about that flight was that the RSSI didn't appear to
> change much during the whole flight. During ascent, telemetry
> disappeared until apogee. Adrian generally builds out of CF with the
> antenna only visible after separation, so this didn't surprise me,
> although I do like to be able to find the spot when a shovel is the
> approved recovery tool.
>
> During descent, RSSI varied between -85 and -96dBm, with almost all
> packets being received successfully. I'll note that Adrian is flying
> version 0.9 firmware, which uses a much longer packet than we use today
> (94 bytes instead of 32 bytes), which could increase the error rate by
> some amount.
>
> Here's a plot of RSSI and height during the flight:
>
>
>
> Given that success, I'd say we'd easily receive most of the packets from
> 35k', assuming a similar antenna configuration, especially the newer
> 32-byte telemetry format.
>
> -keith
>
> _______________________________________________
> altusmetrum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gag.com/mailman/listinfo/altusmetrum
>
>
_______________________________________________
altusmetrum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gag.com/mailman/listinfo/altusmetrum

Reply via email to