On 6/25/19 11:33 AM, Keith Packard wrote: > That's not what we're waiting for -- we're just compensating for the > inaccuracy in computing apogee based on acceleration alone. We don't > have a lot of precision in measuring acceleration because we need such a > large range, that means there's a significant error in each measurement, > leading to (potentially) large errors in speed computation and missing > apogee by many seconds. Adding a long delay ensures that the apogee pyro > event happens after apogee, potentially long after apogee. >
I would really like to know why you think that 20 counts/G is insufficient when the AltAcc managed to work with 3. -- https://web.archive.org/web/20190214181851/http://home.earthlink.net/~david.schultz/ (Web pages available only at the Wayback Machine because Earthlink terminated that service.) _______________________________________________ altusmetrum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gag.com/mailman/listinfo/altusmetrum
