On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:39:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > A. This is backup software that all of us depend upon.
> > B. You don't provide an updated known bugs list.
>
> There's the patches list, in which fixed bugs are posted as soon as
> they're known about.
Actually, that's exactly why I suspected a major unresolved issue -- we get
to see the patches, but we don't have visibility into unresolved issues.
> Basically, someone has to go over all the existing documentation, see
> if it still applies to the current behavior, update what doesn't and
> see if there are any of the new features that are not documented and
> document them. Rewriting some parts that are too old to be useful and
> others that are really not very well-written can be left for the next
> release :-)
Can this be contributed easily from the outside? IE, can I submit a context
patch? If I was to go over the docs and fix things I know are wrong or
misleading ... it probably wouldn't be the definitive effort, but it could
help.
--
Joe Rhett Chief Technology Officer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISite Services, Inc.
PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
