Hi,
yes i meant "&&" instead of "&"......
sorry for the typo
Christoph
Nate Eldredge schrieb:
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
>
> > Funny, if I do something like:
> >
> > amdump default & mt -f /dev/nst0 eject
>
> I think he meant && instead of &. && will execute the second command only
> if the first succeeds. & will run the first command in the background and
> immediately start the second, which is clearly wrong here.
>
> >
> > The tape ejects first and Amanda gives an error 'no tape found'.
> > I run Debian Linux 2.2
>
> --
> Nate Eldredge
> HMC CS Staff
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
