I have 22 tapes, with 5 day rotation. So since tape 10 was not holding
recent data it was acceptable to dump to it. Hmm. I think I follow that.
Any recommedations for getting my tape rotation to go 8-9-10-11 again, not
8-10-9-11?
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:46:03AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2001, Joshua E Warchol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, that seems to go counter to what I believe Amanda wants to
> > do. During a normal amdump session it will not write to tape 10 if
> > it expects tape 9
>
> If tape 10 is not one of the latest `tapecycle - 1' tapes, Amanda will
> accept to overwrite it.
>
> --
> Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
> CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
--
Joshua Warchol
UNIX Systems Administrator
DSL.net
