I have always wondered .. why does amanda pipe ufsdump output to ufsrestore before sending it to the tape device? If I ufsdump direct to tape, eg. ufsdump 0f /dev/rmt/0n / I consistently achieve 3mb/second (Exabyte mammoth). If amanda is dumping direct to tape (file systems that are bigger than the holding disk), I'm lucky if i get 1mb/second. If it's going from the holding disk to tape, I get 3mb/second, as expected. g.
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Grant Beattie
- Re: why | ufsrestore? John R. Jackson
- RE: why | ufsrestore? Grant Beattie
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Gerhard den Hollander
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Jean-Louis Martineau
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Gerhard den Hollander
- Re: why | ufsrestore? John R. Jackson
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Marc W. Mengel
- RE: why | ufsrestore? Grant Beattie
- Re: why | ufsrestore? John R. Jackson
- Re: why | ufsrestore? Marc W. Mengel
