Ryan Williams wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> > the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> > time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> > be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light day. The list
> > messages are already tagged in the Sender: header. Please learn to
> > use it.
>
> Who is to say that we would be the ones inconveniencing others. If everyone
> but you wants this, you would be inconveniencing us to ask that it was not
> done. I was just placing out an idea when I suggested this just to get some
> feed back and to see what other people thought about this. We all know your
> opinion about the matter now how about we hear some other peoples opinions.
I agree with Mitch. I like concise, pertinent subject lines so that I
can determine if it is a subject matter that I am interested in or can
help with.
Mike Ellebracht
www.linuxgruven.com
--------------------
To be is to do I. Kant
To do is to be A. Sartre
Yabba-Dabba-Do F. Flinstone
