Re: Incorrect results from tapetype for DDS3?

[Bernhard R. Erdmann]

> I ran `tapetype' so that I could add an entry for our DDS3 (12/24GB)
> DAT drive, but the resulting tape length is shorter than I expected.
> Here's what I got (I changed the comment):
> 
> define tapetype DDS3 {
>     comment "Python 04106-XXX"
>     length 9860 mbytes
>     filemark 0 kbytes
>     speed 918 kbytes
> }

I assume you worked with hardware compression. Don't use HW comp. with
tapetype.