On May 17, 2001, "C. Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I followed suggestions to remove ext2 dump so > Amanda would detect xfsdump and recompiled, but I find this rather inelegant. What is inelegant? Removing ext2 dump? You didn't have to do that. You only need xfsdump available at configure time to get the xfsdump supporting bits enabled; the existence of ext2 dump doesn't make a difference. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: Linux and dump Dan Wilder
- Re: Linux and dump Anthony A. D. Talltree
- Re: Linux and dump Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: Linux and dump Christoph Scheeder
- Re: Linux and dump Anthony A. D. Talltree
- Re: Linux and dump C. Chan
- Re: Linux and dump Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: Linux and dump C. Chan
- Re: Linux and dump Ron Stanonik
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Linux and dump Jonathan Dill
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Linux and dump Dan Wilder
- Re: Linux and dump John R. Jackson
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Linux and dump Dan Wilder
- Re: Linux and dump Gerhard den Hollander
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Linux and dump Dan Wilder
- Re: Linux and dump Alexandre Oliva