And in that header, look at the value of the reply-to.
Case in point, this message came to me, and not the list.
-dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon LaBadie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 11:06 PM
> To: Dan Garthwaite
> Subject: Re: schedual line 10: syntax error - HELP
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:51:07AM -0500, Dan Garthwaite wrote:
> > Why doesn't this list set the REPLY-TO to amanda-users?
> >
> >>> End of included message <<<
>
> It does when I get them. That is how I'm replying.
> Here is a chunk of the headers I got on this mail:
>
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 7 15:13:27 2001
> Received: from guiness.omniscient.com
> (guiness.omniscient.com [64.134.101.78])
> ...
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> From: "Dan Garthwaite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Jeff Pratt'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: schedual line 10: syntax error - HELP
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:51:07 -0500
> Message-Id: <001101c17e65$7081dc80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> --
> Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> JG Computing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
> Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
>
