Reply-To: for lists is a long-debated, can't-please-all-of-the-people, subject. Some people like it. Some people hate it. The administrator for this list has chosen not to use it. The Reply-To: below was added by you. Which is why Jon's reply came to you and not to the list.
-Mitch On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Dan Garthwaite wrote: > And in that header, look at the value of the reply-to. > Case in point, this message came to me, and not the list. > > -dan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jon LaBadie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 11:06 PM > > To: Dan Garthwaite > > Subject: Re: schedual line 10: syntax error - HELP > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:51:07AM -0500, Dan Garthwaite wrote: > > > Why doesn't this list set the REPLY-TO to amanda-users? > > > > > >>> End of included message <<< > > > > It does when I get them. That is how I'm replying. > > Here is a chunk of the headers I got on this mail: > > > > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 7 15:13:27 2001 > > Received: from guiness.omniscient.com > > (guiness.omniscient.com [64.134.101.78]) > > ... > > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > From: "Dan Garthwaite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "'Jeff Pratt'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: schedual line 10: syntax error - HELP > > Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:51:07 -0500 > > Message-Id: <001101c17e65$7081dc80$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > JG Computing [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 > > Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax) > > >
