On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Don Potter wrote:
> What is the length of the tapetype....using hardware compression you > will need to adjust the length to what you expect your actually > compression ratio to be..if you expect each tape to be about 70gb then > your length would be 70000 mbytes. Ah... so perhaps this is causing the issue? define tapetype DLTtapeIV { comment "DLTtape IV - 40 GB" length 33706 mbytes filemark 43 kbytes speed 1820 kps } That was what the tapetype run gave us. So I guess you're saying that using the cbn device rather than the bn or n device is creating a conflict? I'm just wondering why amanda would abandon partitions... it did seem to properly determine that it had ~70 Gb to work with... - Eric