On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:53:00PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > > I'm on slightly less shaky ground, as I increased my tapecycle a couple > > months ago, but my recollection is that amanda refused to overwrite used > > tapes until all new tapes had been used. I know that it requested a > > new tape each time until all new tapes had been used. > > Agreed if you are increasing the tapecycle. Amanda refuses to use any > old tapes until at least tapecycle number of tapes are in use. > > But ahall, the OP, was changing tape types, ait-1 to ait-2 if I recall. > Thus the new tapes were not for an increased tapecycle. They were > simply unused and labeled with the same label as the previous tapes.
So the question is what happens in tapelist to tape labels that are "relabeled". Will they end up at the top with the date stamp zero? If so, then they would appear just like newly added tapes, wouldn't they? -- Ulrik Sandberg
