Jon LaBadie wrote: > Sounds like you took it personally.
Possibly - I replied pre-morning coffee. Sorry if my tone was a bit aggressive. > Gene was commenting from a point having viewed many bad packages. > Perhaps yours is wonderous. It cures all know diseases! It's a floor wax, it's a desert whip! No, honestly! > That has not been the general experience > of long time contributers to this list. It may then be time to re-evaluate that perception. It's just too simplistic to blow off a packaged amanda, especially when there are possible support issues involved. It's possible that someone following Gene's advice may find that their Red Hat Network setup is compromised, for example. And not everybody *has* the luxury of being able to compile from source. http://people.redhat.com/rkearey/amanda.spec is the current spec file, feel free to have a look. Note: Not speaking for Red Hat here, nor am I the amanda package maintainer - just a satisfied user thereof. -- Rob Kearey Website: http://apac.redhat.com Red Hat Asia-Pacific Legal: http://apac.redhat.com/disclaimer +61 7 3872 4803 Stuff: http://people.redhat.com/rkearey
