> Toralf Lund wrote:
> 
>>> On Monday 14 October 2002 04:56, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> >Yes, that's what I'm doing. The problem with this is that
>>> > something easily gets left out as new directories are created.
>>> >
>>> >How about
>>> >
>>> >1. Allowing wildcards in the disklist file
>>> >2. Having some kind of "auto expansion" mode, where a directory in
>>> > the disklist file would be traversed recursively and replaced
>>> > with its "leaf" or "level n" sub directories.
>>> 
>>> I believe that one can use regex expressions to break it up
>>> alphabeticly, like one entry to cover [a*-c*], the next for [d*-g*]
>>> etc, but I've no idea of the exact syntax required as I've never
>>> done that.
>> 
>> That would certainly be useful in some cases, although I was thinking 
>> more along the lines of listing
>> 
>> some-host /some-dir/* full-tar
>> 
>> in disklist file, and having Amanda treat this as if one entry for each 
>> sub directory of /some-dir was included.
>> 
>> 
> OK, now I might be wrong but I thought this was already possible 
> according to the examples in the initial disklist file.  I'll paste 
> below in case you didn't get that file for whatever reason:
No, I don't have those examples. Also, I don't quite recognise the syntax. 
What version is this example from? 2.4.3? I'm still on 2.4.2p2...

> # An example of how to separate a big disk (/diskA) in multiple smaller 
> entry
> # using GNUTAR.
> # I suggest to always use the diskdevice in the diskname.
> # Don't forget to use the same spindle for all entry.
[ snip ]
> 
> I would think you could use something like this to get your wildcards, I 
> do (at least I think I do since I have it set up to do so but haven't 
> verified).
Well, yes and no. Yes, I may be able to set up everything in this manner. 
No, it was not quite what I had in mind. What I'd really like is some way 
to specify multiple *backup* disklist entries using just one disklist 
*file* entry, if you know what I'm saying. (I find it a bit hard to 
explain this due to lack of good terminology.)

- Toralf

Reply via email to