On Thursday 19 June 2003 14:41, Tom Brown wrote: >> I also have such a situation! >> >> if I try to relabel it, it say that the tape is already labeled. >> But this > >is > >> probably >> read from tapelist file and not really from the tape. >> >> version 2.4.4-20030605 >> chg-zd-mtx > >i have a theory to my problem but not 100% certain yet. > >i have, today, run a amtapetype on the drive. I suspect this process >overwrote the label on the tape.
Yes it did. > I suspect this as i did an amlabel > on a tape in a different system ysterday and today did an > amtapetype. Guess what i then did an amtape config show and i got > 'not an amanda tape' The label must actually match the amanda maintained list I believe. But, there is little to prevent you from useing the -f option, which forces the label to be written anyway. >in my case i suspect operator error (again!) > >Tom Maybe. :) -- Cheers, Gene AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512M 99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
