Paul Bijnens wrote: > This directive would be needed by a client, and currently a client > does not need a configuration file.
Could it not be supplied from the server to the client, as I believe the "exclude list" option is? > The other reason is that no-one submitted a patch (for a seperate > optional configuration file used by client programs). Personally, I like the idea that all the config is done in one place (on the server). As far as submitted patches; if there's no way to do what we want to do, then I guess we'll be working on one... :-)
