On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:48:27AM -0800, Adam Ardis wrote: > I agree, it's most likely not amanda at this point. > /dev/rmt are sym links, so I used the raw device for > the mt command. The drives are all standalone, but on > the same SCSI target.
This doesn't seem right. Here is just the device paths of the 4 devices you gave: > > ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:ubn > ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:ubn > ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:ubn > ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:ubn That says to my understanding that they are scsi id's 2-5. In contrast, here are the paths to my two rmt devices, 0 and 1 (no letters for simplicity): ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci9004,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0: ../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci9004,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1: These are the same scsi id (5), but different luns (0 & 1). The actual device is a drive with a changer. The drive appears at lun 0, the changer at lun 1, but both are the same scsi id. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
