On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:19:33AM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > Matt Hyclak wrote: > > > >Yes, as Paul Bijnens pointed out in a private mail, I had already gone over > >what amanda knew about. In that case, largestfit falls back to the largest > >dump available. > > Actually falls back to "first" (in the queue). But by Murphy's Law > that image rarely fits in the small unknown gap before the Real End > Of Tape.
Is there a reason to not use "smallest", giving best chance to fit? > The idea and patch is actually from Orion Poplawsky, who posted it > to amanda-hackers, including some other fixes: > ... > > I haven't had yet the time to download and install 2.4.5. Maybe > it's already included in there. If not, I would be very happy this > is included in the next version. It really helps filling a tape > to the last byte (and saves me a tape each day). Sounds like a good addition. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
