Guy Dallaire wrote:


2005/11/25, Stefan G. Weichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:

    Might sound strange, but are you sure that you use the non-rewinding
    tape-device when using amrecover?

    Stefan


Why would amanda erase what it extracted in this case ? In the worst case, what I would expect is amanda giving some sort of error instead

I once noticed the behavior that amrecover restored the requested files (by doing an amrestore in the back) and when it had finished restoring the related tar-file the usage of the rewinding tape-device caused the tapedrive to rewind so amrestore found the same tar-file "again" and started overwriting the already restored directory.

This was particularly annoying at the time I learnt about that: restoring from the last good tape at a client's site, and this tape was his last hope ... after a night of shoeshining I noticed the missing "n" in the devicefile used ;) after all it was a successful restore, yes.

But as I read in the other reply, Francesc uses the proper nonrewinding device ...

Stefan.


Reply via email to