On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Chris Hoogendyk <[email protected]> wrote: > The algorithm just seems a bit weird. I never thought that fast-searchable > would jump over the new tapes, especially since they are marked reuse. I > always assumed it would check the tapes in order until it found one that was > suitable.
It's not just a bit weird, it's very weird. That's why I wrote up the manpage :) Hopefully we'll be adding some new, less insane taperscan algorithms in 3.2. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
