On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:13:59PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Jon LaBadie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The logfiles are there and they contain info about the tapes listed.
> > I'm beginning to think the warnings are poorly worded.
> > I suspect they really mean that the DLE I asked about is not found
> > on those particular tapes.
> >
> > Can anyone corroborate my suspicions?
>
> Not quite - it means that Amanda could not find a logfile
> corresponding to those entries in the tapelist. Do the trace logfiles
> you've identified have the correct datestamp?
>
Yes, here are three messages and a the relevant parts of an ls -l.
Warning: no log files found for tape Daily-023 written 2010-09-03 03:08:02
Warning: no log files found for tape Daily-013 written 2010-08-29 18:42:51
Warning: no log files found for tape Daily-009 written 2010-08-28 22:58:48
-rw-------. 1 amandabackup disk 4908 Aug 29 00:07 log.20100828225848.0
-rw-------. 1 amandabackup disk 1919 Aug 29 19:45 log.20100829184251.0
-rw-------. 1 amandabackup disk 16496 Sep 3 11:10 log.20100903030802.0
And the specified tapes are mentioned in the logs:
$ egrep -c 'Daily-0(09|13|23)' log.20100828225848.0 \
log.20100829184251.0 \
log.20100903030802.0
log.20100828225848.0:9
log.20100829184251.0:3
log.20100903030802.0:25
> As for the PARTIAL OK, PARTIAL PARTIAL, etc. status - those have to do
> with retries, I believe.
I just thought the 'partial partial' mesg was fun.
jon
--
Jon H. LaBadie [email protected]
JG Computing
12027 Creekbend Drive (703) 787-0884
Reston, VA 20194 (703) 787-0922 (fax)
