On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Jon LaBadie <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll certainly defer to you knowledge of the difficulty. I was thinking > that the logic is already there for the split disk feature. The added > code would be for saving its state and recreating it on the next flush.
Yes, that would be tricky, as would finding a way to record the continuation of the dump in the catalog (the catalog is log-based, so you can't "edit" an already-recorded dump). > I know, Suitable Patches Are Always Welcomed. :) I've been trying not to say that too much, but yeah :) Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
