I wonder if one could somehow use the  AMVAULT  command to  do this?
It serves to make a COPY  of a dump tape  (as I understand it).

At the very least,  you could have a cron job  copy the  tape  back  *off*  of 
the
tape,  onto a spare corner of the holding disk that you had labeled as   
“virtual disk”
tape storage.
Or,  no wait …..    do that on-disk copy first.   Have the holding disk data   
saved to another
portion of the large disk area  that is a “virtual disk tape storage”  as your 
nightly
backup tape.   But since you really want a physical tape  (I gather you do?  I 
do.)
then use  AMVAULT   to copy  the virtual disk  off to the real tape that you 
want.
Every night.   This would leave you with a copy of it on virtual disk.    Which 
could be
set up to have a very short  recycle period,  if you like?  (Assuming you don’t 
have
*that*  much space to spare.)

Maybe play with this idea a bit?

Deb Baddorf
Fermilab

( sorry for capitalizing words like  AMVAULT — my mac keeps trying to change
the spelling of words that I write)


On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>>>> "JM" == Jean-Louis Martineau <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> JM> The main problem is that if you leave the dump in the holding disk,
> JM> amanda will automatically re-flush (autoflush) them on the next run.
> JM> There is no way to store the information about dump that are already
> JM> flushed and dump that are not flushed.
> 
> Well, I figured as a hack, they'd just get renamed in some way that the
> code would ignore when it comes to flushing things, and a cron job would
> nuke the oldest ones every few minutes if the disk is full.  But of
> course that wouldn't integrate the held dumps with the regular restore
> process.
> 
> JM> The amanda development branch have that capabilities. Implementing
> JM> this feature will be a lot easier.
> 
> Cool.  It's not as if I'm in a huge hurry.  I just thought it might be
> nice to use the holding disk for more than just a very temporary staging
> area.
> 
> - J<


Reply via email to