Ned Danieley <[email protected]> wrote:
> ah, that makes sense. no, I haven't run 'amtapetype'; I just assumed that
> the rated capacity would be accurate. I'll give it a try; in the meantime,
> has anyone run 'amtapetype' on an LTO6 tape? I have an HP Ultrium 6 drive.
I did and got:
define tapetype LTO6 {
comment "Created by amtapetype; compression disabled"
length 2442954880 kbytes
filemark 7456397 kbytes
speed 154519 kps
blocksize 32 kbytes
}
Steve
--
Steven J. Backus Computer Systems Manager
University of Utah E-Mail: [email protected]
Genetic Epidemiology Alternate: [email protected]
391 Chipeta Way -- Suite D Office: 801.587.9308
Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1266 http://www.math.utah.edu/~backus
