> On Jan 13, 2019, at 4:20 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Am 10.01.19 um 20:41 schrieb Debra S Baddorf:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Am 30.11.18 um 19:40 schrieb Debra S Baddorf:
>>> 
>>>> IFF you have the holding disk space, you might want these params:
>>>> 
>>>> flush-threshold-dumped        300 # (or perhaps only 150)  ## I have NOT 
>>>> tested this one
>>>> flush-threshold-scheduled     100    #
>>>> ###However, all dumps will be flushed; none will
>>>> ### be left on the holding disk.
>>>> taperflush    0
>>>> autoflush                     yes
>>> 
>>> I am still trying to come up with a set of parameters to keep the latest
>>> lev0 backups in holdingdisk *additional* to having them on tape.
>>> 
>>> Trying to accumulate a lev0 of every DLE on disk to then switch over to
>>> the archive tapes and flush to them.
>>> 
>>> As far as I understand that would mean increasing taperflush and set
>>> autoflush to NO, right?
>>> 
>>> (only flush intentionally ...)
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> As I understand it,  “autoflush”  only applies to files left over from 
>> previous runs.
>> Taperflush might do what you want, if you set it to 1000  ???   But I’m 
>> doubtful.
>> But either one means writing to tape AND removing from disk.
>> 
>> Other readers:  is there a newer means to leave dumps on disk AND tape them?
>> I don’t think the above parameters are able to do that, at all.
>> But I’ve heard snippets that make me think other params in the latest version
>> can do it.
>> 
>> Stefan - we need input from others who have done this  (leaving dumps on disk
>> AND on tape).   If nobody answers, maybe start a new “thread”  with this 
>> actual
>> question in the subject line.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> I think that "vaulting" with amvault might help here ... although I
> still struggle with getting the picture.
> 
> Especially as I only have one tapedrive, I can't copy from one to the other.
> 
> Back then I tried to define two storages, one with the normal daily
> tapes (and separate labels), a second with archive tapes and the
> additional line:
> 
> dump-selection ALL FULL
> 
> I should rethink that approach.


You can let the normal job send the dumps to tape,  and then
“vault”  a copy back onto a “vtape”  on disk  (not your holding disk,
but that’s semantics).
That might suit your need.

I’ve done vaulting from a tape onto a disk area …..  moved the
disk area to another node,  and vaulted again to copy it to a
different flavor of tape drive.       So the very first part of my task
might suit you to a tee.

Deb Baddorf

Reply via email to