Hi Debra,

 Yes, this will work if I use different labels not related with the
name of the diskdevice, the only problem is more work when I run
amstatus and amrecover to match the label with the disk/diredctory

Cheers,
Nuno

On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 18:37 +0000, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 2019, at 7:38 AM, Nuno Dias <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I guess another possible solution is to using disknames of a form
> > > that
> > > are designend to be unique, e.g. something like (not tested)
> > > 
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > MACHINE  dir-main   /dir {
> > > >         tar
> > > >         exclude "./subdir/*"
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > MACHINE dir-subdir /dir {
> > > >         tar
> > > >         include "./subdir/*"
> > > > }
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > 
> > > ... and use those disknames on the amdump command line...  (But
> > > you
> > > have to choose disknames carefully so your Amanda Mail Report
> > > looks
> > > reasonable, etc.)
> > > 
> > > 
> > >                                                   Nathan
> > > 
> Possibly not tested, but that was what I was describing.  I use text-
> only disknames
> like that all the time.  No slashes in them, so they cannot be
> confused with actual disk designations!
> 
> Deb Baddorf
> Fermilab
> 
> 
-- 
Nuno Dias <[email protected]>
LIP

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to