> On Ott. 16, 2016, 12:06 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > src/CMakeLists.txt, lines 955-958
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/diff/1/?file=482253#file482253line955>
> >
> >     What about these .desktop files? I seems that these should be moved, 
> > too, at least for consistency.
> 
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>     No, those are services. The specification talks about the reverse DNS 
> syntax only for applications:
>     " For applications, the part of the name of the desktop file (before the 
> .desktop) should follow the "reverse DNS" convention, e.g. 
> org.example.FooViewer.desktop. "
>     
>     
> https://specifications.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s02.html

I think that the other comments answer this point; do you have any other 
concern? This is one of the last combination of desktop+appdata files on 
kde.org without namespace.


- Luigi


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/#review100035
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Ott. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Ott. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok and Matthias Klumpp.
> 
> 
> Repository: amarok
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - add the organization namespace to the desktop and then appdata files, 
> according the specification;
> - use the new directory for metadata (metainfo) files.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 327ec10 
>   src/amarok.appdata.xml c580fd5 
>   src/amarok.desktop  
>   src/amarok_containers.desktop  
>   src/dbus/mpris2/MediaPlayer2.cpp a1d1bda 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiles, the files are installed in the expected places.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Luigi Toscano
> 
>

Reply via email to