> On Oct. 16, 2016, 12:06 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote: > > src/CMakeLists.txt, lines 955-958 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/diff/1/?file=482253#file482253line955> > > > > What about these .desktop files? I seems that these should be moved, > > too, at least for consistency. > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > No, those are services. The specification talks about the reverse DNS > syntax only for applications: > " For applications, the part of the name of the desktop file (before the > .desktop) should follow the "reverse DNS" convention, e.g. > org.example.FooViewer.desktop. " > > > https://specifications.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s02.html > > Luigi Toscano wrote: > I think that the other comments answer this point; do you have any other > concern? This is one of the last combination of desktop+appdata files on > kde.org without namespace.
Gently ping... - Luigi ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/#review100035 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 16, 2016, 4:12 p.m.) > > > Review request for Amarok and Matthias Klumpp. > > > Repository: amarok > > > Description > ------- > > - add the organization namespace to the desktop and then appdata files, > according the specification; > - use the new directory for metadata (metainfo) files. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/CMakeLists.txt 327ec10 > src/amarok.appdata.xml c580fd5 > src/amarok.desktop > src/amarok_containers.desktop > src/dbus/mpris2/MediaPlayer2.cpp a1d1bda > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129192/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Compiles, the files are installed in the expected places. > > > Thanks, > > Luigi Toscano > >