> Which would mean that either you have a hash collision, would would be > very unprobable, or the first mail that got hashed and cached came > from a whitelisted sender.
Whitelisting should have no effect there, it does not propagate through cache, white/blacklisting is always re-checked on per-recipient basis. In case of cached result, one can search through the log for the original spam check on the same body digest code to get further details. Mark ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
