On 8/19/05, Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone here run SpamAssassin AND Dspam at the same time? Any extra > benefits? > > I'm skeptical. I love DSPAM, but I don't think they work well together, > especially when you have lazy users who will refuse to train (it will just > make things worse).... > > However, the big boss thinks its a good idea... >
I run one... :) so far so good. DSPAM is pretty accurate, though you have to feed it spam corpus to build up a good foundation. DSPAM is also capable of running in daemon mode, wherein the dspam server would maintain a persistent connection to the mysql database and dspamc client will feed in the messages. However I don't use DSPAM daemon mode in conjunction in amavisd-new, since there were a couple of instances wherein the use of dspamc will cause a DSPAM LEARN SPAM failed. So currently I'm sticking with the regular dspam mode. Regards, Peter ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
