> ...My guess is the emji.net headers were there prior to blast.com accepting > this message. ... > So it looks like existing X-Spam headers are not removed unless spam > scanning is enabled. It does not mean blast.com is scanning.
Indeed. There is no need to remove such pre-existing headers unless one is checking for spam on his own server. Clients should be ignoring such headers unless the mail manager tells them otherwise. Mark ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
