I am > going to assume you are using your server B as a secondary MX for > your domain. On server A, one thing you might consider doing is > bypassing spam checks (or bypassing amavisd-new) for mail received > from server B. That way the X-Spam headers created by server B will > not be touched and you will not have the possibility of having the > Subject rewritten twice, so you will not get: > > It would also save processing power since the mail has already gone > through spam checks once before, but of course it's your decision.
Yes, it's the better way I think too. I am going to do it that way. > I would also investigate why the spam scored lower on server A > than it did on server B (when it was relayed from server B). It could > be spamassassin's trusted_networks and internal_networks are not > configured properly. > I can't see why it's not being scored at all and tags removed. I haven't such options in spamassassin, anyway I will make all messages coming from server B go to server A without any filtering at all. I will then play with it to try to find why. I own a /24 cidr net block, and both servers are in the same netblock. Both, postfix have $mynetworks parameters set to 200.59.45.0/24, I tried setting up a single IP (/32) but it didn't change anything. Well, thanks a lot for your help and time. If I find this behavior is not a mistake configuration made by me (which I think it's) I will let you know. Again, thanks. Pablo ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
