Gary V wrote: > It's sad, but we are at war with the spammers and the virus writers > and the adware companies and the hackers and the spyware writers. > Their tactics change on a daily basis, and so must ours. War often > requires effort, sorry.
I know that. Which is why I keep pointing out that spammers have adopted tactics to deliberately poison bayes caches. But everyone ignores that. Unless the bayes mechanisms are updated to be smarter, the current crop of bayes-polluting auto-bot spam will invalidate everyone's bayes. > What version of SpamAssassin are you running? Are you using any SARE > rules? Nope. I'm coming off of using CanIt, which does a damn good job. Since I can't afford the pro version for my personal machine, I was just checking out how good the open source interfaces have gotten. (besides spamassassin, which is obviously the core of CanIt's rules too) I'm fairly pleased with amavis, but struggling with the lack of documentation. Something that I plan to spend a lot of November improving, once I've gotten my head around all of it. I do plan to look at SARE and sa-update and various other things, but right now I'm working deliberately with as-bone-stock-as-possible just to see how well it works out of the box. -- Jo Rhett Network/Software Engineer Net Consonance ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
