Bill wrote: > Gary V wrote the following on 5/31/2007 8:05 AM -0800: >> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2135092,00.asp >> >>
> I wonder how ClamAV would have faired had the SaneSecurity and MSRBL > signatures been included when tested. > Bill One has to remember that ClamAV focuses first on viruses spread via email. Since in our corner of the world that is what we are concerned with, I'm sure there would be much less of a discrepancy if the tests only dealt with that type of malware. Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
