Gary V schrieb: > Bill wrote: > >> Gary V wrote the following on 5/31/2007 8:05 AM -0800: >>> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2135092,00.asp >>> >>> > >> I wonder how ClamAV would have faired had the SaneSecurity and MSRBL >> signatures been included when tested. > >> Bill > > One has to remember that ClamAV focuses first on viruses spread via email. > Since in our corner of the world that is what we are concerned with, > I'm sure there would be much less of a discrepancy if the tests only > dealt with that type of malware.
Ack. Often Clamav is more up-to-date than the Symantec Mail Scanner (sometimes Symantec never catches some of the "Casino/Phising Viruses") Personally i believe that ClamAV is better a better MailScanner than most products you have to pay for ... > Gary V -- Grüsse/Greetings MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
