Len, > good point, was su'd to root > > > If not - and > >I suspect you're not - different per-user SA settings may be the source > >of these differences. What score do you get when you run spamc on that > >same file as the amavis user? > > I changed the file to vscan:vscan, su'd to vscan and command line > spamassassin returned: > > Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required) > > spamc -c running as vscan returns: > > $ spamc -c < /home/harry/declude/20080729/70537530.eml > 10.2/5.0
What matters is what username SpamAssassin modules see (spamd and amavisd). Spamc is just a client. For test purposes it is simpler and more straightforward to just use a command line 'spamassassin' command, e.g.: # su vscan -c 'spamassassin -t -D <test.msg' Just comparing a final score is not as revealing as comparing a list of SpamAssassin tests which fired. See where these sets differ between amavisd+SpamAssassin and a command line spamassassin. And make sure both tests see the same message, without one being clobbered by a MUA or having additional header fields inserted or deleted. Having additional Received header filed can influence SpamAssassin's notions of trusted/internal vs. external MTA boundary. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
