Thanks for your reply :)
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:11:45 +0200
Mark Martinec <mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si> wrote:
> The DSN for spam is suppressed when spam score exceeds spam_dsn_cutoff_level.
Yes, that's why I set it so high, I was using the GTUBE email to test
which scores around 1000.
> Note that since 2.4.3 there are two such levels:
>
> 2.4.3 release_notes:
>
> - introduce new variable @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps (also member of
> policy banks), complementing an existing by-recipient list of lookup tables
> @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps. The new variable serves to make it possible
> to trim down spam bounces to domains sending their own bounces with non-null
> return path (envelope sender address) and without DSN NOTIFY=NEVER option,
> but also to frequently abused domains, or to those sending marginal spam.
> When spam level exceeds either the @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps
> or the @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps level, (non)delivery status notification
> is suppressed even with $final_spam_destiny set to D_BOUNCE;
>
> Their defaults are:
>
> @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps = (\$sa_dsn_cutoff_level);
> @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps = (\$sa_dsn_cutoff_level);
>
> If your intention is to disable spam cutoff level within a
> policy bank, set both to undef:
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps => undef,
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps => undef,
> or set the:
> sa_dsn_cutoff_level => undef,
> which achieves the same.
Interesting, although I did manage to get the result I was looking for
once I restarted Amavis *and* postfix. Not sure why...
> > warnspamsender => 1,
>
> Don't do this, the 'warnspamsender' is a relict from old versions
> and is only there for compatibility with old config files. Sending
> of a DSN (= bounce) is nowadays controlled through final_spam_destiny
> and the spam_dsn_cutoff_level.
Ah. OK. I have removed it.
> > In testing, I get spam notifications to my spam_admin address (this is
> > not configured elsewhere), but the spam is not bounced to the sender.
>
> because of a missing spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps=>undef
I'll add this.
> > Also, the notification email says "Content analysis details: (998.8
> > points, 5.0 required)" but "5.0" is not the setting anywhere, and
> > clearly not in this policy.
>
> The "5.0" comes from a SpamAssassin config file ('required_hits')
> and only appears in the SpamAssassin report, it has no other
> effect. Just ignore it, or for cosmetic reasons set required_hits
> in local.cf to your kill level (or tag2 level if you prefer).
Ah, OK. Thanks!
> > What is the difference between warnspamsender and
> > "final_spam_destiny => D_BOUNCE" supposed to be
> > anyway?
>
> It's conceptually the same thing, the warnspamsender is mapped to
> final_spam_destiny for backwards compatibility. Don't bother with
> warnspamsender and don't change its default value, just pretend
> it never existed.
OK, cool. Good to know.
> > It seems the "originating => 1" must override certain things.
> > I have cut it out and am getting behavior closer to what I want.
>
> Don't do that. If you know mail hitting a policy bank is coming
> from local networks or authenticated users, the 'originating'
> flag is supposed to be set - it allows amavisd to distinguish
> between internal-to-internal and inbound mail, among other
> things it controls DKIM signing.
Again, thanks for that info!
--TimH
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
