On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Michael Scheidell <scheid...@secnap.net> wrote: > Same thing for Freebsd as well. > we don't start spamd on freebsd. we start amavisd. postfix then hands it to > amavisd, who scans it and passes it back to postfix. > (so, there are 'x' number of amavisd services sitting in the background > waiting for data)
Does anyone know if Amavisd-new uses significantly less RAM than 'spamd' service running? I have never ran them individually to see the difference in resources but it would be interesting. I am only 'assuming' Amavisd developers decided to utilize spamd libraries to allow the system to not require both daemons running, correct? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
