On 12/11/2009 6:29 PM, Carlos Williams wrote: > > Does anyone know if Amavisd-new uses significantly less RAM than > 'spamd' service running? I have never ran them individually to see the > difference in resources but it would be interesting.
About the same overall. > I am only > 'assuming' Amavisd developers decided to utilize spamd libraries to > allow the system to not require both daemons running, correct? amavisd-new pre-loads necessary perl modules (including SA) to save start-up time. spamd pre-loads the SA perl modules to save start-up time. Amavisd-new doesn't use spamd because there's no need to pre-load modules twice. -- Noel Jones ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
