-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:46:32 +0200 > Von: Mark Martinec <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: amavisd-new 2.7.1 , dkim-adsp=pass
> > > Note that ADSP tests *are* implemented by the DKIM plugin in > > > SpamAssassin, so its results end up as *_ADSP_* rule hits. > > > ADSP failures contribute spam points to the score. > > Steve wrote: > > Not every one is using SpamAssassin. > > Well, yes. The 'dkim-adsp' is on a wish list, but no promises. > > If someone needs dkim-adsp results in the Authentication-Results > header field, the current solution is to use an OpenDKIM milter > in addition to, or instead of the DKIM test in amavisd. > With a caching DNS server a double DNS lookup is not too bad, > as the second request will be fulfilled from a resolver cache. > > I think that hardly any MUA cares for the Authentication-Results > header field at the moment. > I am not aware of any MUA using that info. While having your attention, might I ask you another DKIM related question? What happens if a sender has DKIM and has signed his/her subject line? Does amavis take care of that or will it prefix the subject with SPAM/Not Checked/etc entries and break DKIM? > Mark > // Steve -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
