Hi all, 2010/6/15 Pid <[email protected]>
> On 15/06/2010 10:28, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Hi all guys, > > > >> > >> 1. API in "net.oauth." (to be contributed back to the OAuth WG) > > > > My opinion is -1 for the "net.oauth" package since seems to me a > > little out of scopes. Please don't take it personally, but AFAIK we're > > not allowed to use Apache Incubator as a forge where we could create a > > codebase to contribute to some else, maybe our Mentors could explain > > us better :( > > The project proposal included a clear statement that the API spec would > be available to others wanting to create an alternative implementation. > There were no objections to this in principal. > Pid, I read in the proposal that we're going to deal with "allowing re-use by other developers", and I am fully committed to it, not to develop an (alternative) API to contribute back to OAuth WG, and basically I couldn't see any reason for doing that. Just my opinion. Tommaso
