2010/6/15 Simone Gianni <[email protected]> > Packaging the API specification separately is, IMHO, a must ... even if no > OAuth group ever existed. > > Since, as Pid corrctly pointed out, we have no way to constrain the OAuth > WG > to use Amber, nor forbid them to use or write a reference to an Apache > licensed code, once the API is done and done well, we can draw the WG > attention to our efforts and see what happens. > > I personally hope that our API will be so good to be considered by the WG > and became something that will eventually also be used by other > implementors, or become a de-facto standard, and will work to make it good > enought to be it. >
+1! Tommaso
