+1, agree it should be '1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT' for all artifacts. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected] > wrote:
> +1 for both, moreover the first one *has* to be as Raymond suggests ;) > Tommaso > > 2011/10/25 Raymond Feng <[email protected]> > > > I also realized that we use 1.0-SNAPSHOT for the parent but 0.2-SNAPSHOT > > for oauth-2.0. Would it better that we have one single version id? > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > ________________________________________________________________ > > Raymond Feng > > [email protected] > > Apache Software Foundation Member > > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed that we use 1.0-SNAPSHOT as the maven version id for the > amber > > trunk. Would it better if we follow the incubation convention to use > > "1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT" as the version id? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Raymond > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > Raymond Feng > > > [email protected] > > > Apache Software Foundation Member > > > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > > > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > > > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > >
