On 26/10/2011 03:25, Łukasz Moreń wrote: > +1, agree it should be '1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT' for all artifacts.
Our first release can't possibly be a 1.0. A full version number means a solid, stable release to most people. We should start at 0.x until we're confident we have a rock solid release. p > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> +1 for both, moreover the first one *has* to be as Raymond suggests ;) >> Tommaso >> >> 2011/10/25 Raymond Feng <[email protected]> >> >>> I also realized that we use 1.0-SNAPSHOT for the parent but 0.2-SNAPSHOT >>> for oauth-2.0. Would it better that we have one single version id? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> ________________________________________________________________ >>> Raymond Feng >>> [email protected] >>> Apache Software Foundation Member >>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org >>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com >>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com >>> ________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed that we use 1.0-SNAPSHOT as the maven version id for the >> amber >>> trunk. Would it better if we follow the incubation convention to use >>> "1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT" as the version id? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Raymond >>>> ________________________________________________________________ >>>> Raymond Feng >>>> [email protected] >>>> Apache Software Foundation Member >>>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org >>>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com >>>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com >>>> ________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>> >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
