> The only think to take in consideration is that at the moment Amber code > style is not really "homogeneous". > Whit this I mean (I might be wrong here) that the original code (e.g. > spec-api) and the 2.0 part (former Leeloo) have been developed separately and > for this reason they follow different nomenclature/code style/ etc... > Now at this point I think we might take the decision of which way we want to > follow and adapt the remaining code accordingly.
yup, that was part of the purposes of the older "svn tide-up" thread. proposals? -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/
