On Jan 12, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Ciao Antonio, > >> >> unless I am doing something wrong it looks like I still do not have any >> write/edit permission on the wiki. >> > > I am worried you'll have to contact INFRA[1] > >> If I am not completely wrong some major sites (e.g. twitter) are still using >> version 1.0a of the spec. >> For this reason, if we want to gather any crowd to use Amber it would be >> good to support at least client side also version 1.0a otherwise people >> would be oriented to use some other Java libraries (e.g. Scribe). >> The effort to do it for the client module should not be to huge, but there >> is obviously an overhead. > > That sounds a more than valid reason to implement 1.0a - can you make > a quick search to verify that please? TIA!
Hi Simone, I can confirm Twitter is still using 1.0a . As a general consideration I also think that there are much more users interested to the client part than the one interested to the server part (like me :)). For this reason we could even think about a two phase release (first one we focus on the client/common modules) and second we focus on everything else. I hope you agree than one of our goal is to be mentioned here [0]and here [1] in order to increase the project exposure. WDYT? Regards Antonio [0] http://oauth.net/code/ [1] http://oauth.net/2/ > > I would propose to add that implementation in the current 2.0 impl, > rather than continue developing old stuff... > > best, > -Simo > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/
