On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when > the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one > other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about > OSS so it may be the case :-(
Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance Regards Antonio > What do others think? > Tommaso > > > 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> > >> Hi *, >> >> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double >> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name. >> >> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name >> might overlap with some other pre-existing software. >> So we might need to change the final name... :S >> >> WDYT? >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
