On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:21, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi .+ > > given the fact that the Newcastle University hasn't submitted the > SoftwareGrant for Leelo, Apache Amber and Leeloo are actually two > different projects, so I don't think Leelo is a suitable name for the > current project since it would create a name collision. Correct. If we can't use Amber we'll need a new name. p > Anyone else maybe knows more? > best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Maciej Machulak > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It would be great to change name to the original one - i.e. Leeloo. Credits >> to Lukasz for proposing this name in the first instance :-) >> >> On 7 December 2012 10:46, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly when >>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one >>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking about >>> OSS so it may be the case :-( >>> What do others think? >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi *, >>>> >>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to double >>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name. >>>> >>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name >>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software. >>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Antonio >>>> >>>> >>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Maciej Machulak >> email: [email protected] >> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK) >> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
