On Dec 3, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Dan Smith <daniel.sm...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> My general feeling about the reflection API is that it could do a better job 
> of specifying behavior for the full space of class files, not just those 
> produced by javac. I wouldn't mind a lot more discussion about class file 
> artifacts like attributes. The API javadoc seems like the best place for 
> this. But the status quo is to be vague, and if we're going to raise the bar 
> on precision in reflection API documentation, that's best handled as an 
> independent, holistic effort.

I agree, subject to priorities and who has time to work on what.
Let’s file a tracking issue for this, shall we?
That’s probably the best way to stabilize a consensus.

— John

Reply via email to